At night I put myself to sleep
by pretending I am the Messiah
or that I am not the Messiah,
which are equally narcotic reveries.
As the Messiah
I enter the hearts of women and men,
shaping the distance and inevitability of dying
into a narrow pass;
through this pass each day of life proceeds.
As not the Messiah
I enter the back doors of their dreams
like an old friend
whose fervent, youthful aspirations
were never realized;
now I am merely a laborer,
but a laborer within their dreams.
I take apart the Messiah’s work
like a dismantler of houses,
so that life, aloof to its daily motions
through the narrow pass,
is undone into the general flow.
Then I find myself asleep,
and someone playing Messiah
or not Messiah
greets me in a long hallway
or is caught removing the copper wire
and pipes in my brain,
pilfering them for his own profit;
instead of stopping him,
I offer my assistance
and we work side by side
in silence, until morning.
*
I do indeed put myself to sleep, most nights, by performing various thought experiments. Most recently, there's the "Messiah/Not Messiah" thought experiment. Of late, it has gotten rather ridiculous (even for me), but as a soporific, it is truly effective. Lately, After some sort of anomalous event (a lightning bolt is usually sufficient, if hum-drum; no radioactive-spider bites for me!), I engage in some sort of world-saving activity, and I am then interviewed by (a) Larry King, (b) Oprah, or my favorite, (c) Katie Couric. Sometimes Katie asks me, somewhat suggestively: "Are you REALLY the Messiah?" And I reply, somewhat dryly: "No, Katie. And you -- are you the Virgin Mary?" I have no idea what that really means, but the scene is played out with sufficient suavity. Anyway, before the thought experiment ever gets too far along, I am dead asleep.
Oh, I have played out various other thought experiments (the name is perhaps too intelligent sounding for my cogitations; "cogitations" is also too intelligent sounding for them): for a while, I was --ho-hum, I know! -- stranded a la Crusoe (or Tom Hanks) on an island. The fun of it, though, was simply that I got very down into the details of my survival -- diet, daily labors, efforts to leave the island, journal entries (a previous island resident had conveniently left a nice big stack of blank diaries), naturalistic discoveries, and my evolution as a skilled guitar player -- finally, on a desert island, I was learning to play! (The previous resident had, conveniently, left his guitar -- in fact, most nights his skeleton was holding it in the rocking chair that he also conveniently left behind. Each night, a different assortment of canned goods and tools were to be found in Victorian cupboards.).
In another thought experiment over many nights, I was one of several hostages being held in a joint venture between members of Al Qaeda and an anonymous, but very nasty, Mexican Drug cartel. Naturally, after a rather long ordeal, I save us all ( a sort of Hollywood Squares assortment of celebrities, usually), and survive my wounds. Then I am interviewed by (a), (b), or (c) above.
More recently, though, I have simply (and more usefully) been studying Japanese "kanji" as a sure-fire way to get into a peaceful slumber, without long hours of anxiety and regret for the now-greatly-accumulating errors of my long life -- which include, no doubt, wasting more time than Walter Mitty on a long series of absurdist daydreams that James Thurber would have been embarrassed to put down.
But I -- I have no shame.
*
Meanwhile, as to form and process:
I write pure "free verse" less and less often; generally, I prefer to start with something at least slightly formal, even though I eventually end up "on the ruins of meter" (that's C. K. Williams quoting Adam Zagajewski to a bunch of FAWC fellows many years ago; except that in his NJ accent, it came out "runes of meter," which, as a proud Anglo Saxon, I was much intrigued by).
Jonathan Holden, poet-critic, proposed many years ago that free-versers work from analogues of various kinds -- patterns, templates, matrices...I don't recall his precise language, but I have taken his ideas and worked with them over the years (in fact, you might call it a thought experiment). Basically -- and this is mainly Holden, I guess, rephrased -- free-verse poets fulfill certain forms: confession, prayer, petition, epistle, etc. -- and what they lose in structural dynamics by forsaking meter, they gain (partly) from the rhetorical dynamics of the analogical form.
I don't remember much else about it; and have probably altered it a bit, mixing with my own notions, and with elementary classical rhetoric: progymnasmata. It's the precise dynamics, the stages and boundaries within a particular analogue, that are interesting and fruitful -- but always depending on the tension that one discovers between the analogue and the poem itself; or, between one analogue and a "shadow form" that counters the more overt form.
The above poem might be, then: confession (although refashioned as the kind of confession one might give to a shrink), but also, of course, dream vision (as in Chaucer, the Pearl Poet, etc.), underworld journey (Odysseus, Aeneas), hall of mirrors, mise en abime...or, just a stripped down video game, with two simple bifurcations -- a gate of horn, another of ivory. Also, this process is like "arts of memory" narratives that use journey, spatial structure, or other forms of concomitance, as steps in preservation or invention.
It's all very simple, very ancient -- and very effective, when you study such things intently, and then push them into the periphery while writing.